A welcome change
IN a rare and refreshing move, the Opposition’s INDIA bloc has chosen to engage in a parliamentary debate over the contentious Waqf (Amendment) Bill instead of resorting to protests and walkouts. This marks a departure from the usual theatrics that have often stalled legislative business, depriving the public of substantive discussions on crucial issues. This decision is a much-needed reaffirmation of democratic principles. Contentious as the Waqf Bill may be, a rigorous parliamentary debate offers a platform for parties to present their arguments, expose contradictions in the ruling party’s stance and allow citizens to understand the full implications of the legislation. By pressing for a vote, the Opposition is compelling fence-sitters and NDA allies to take a clear position, thereby ensuring greater accountability.
The Bill has elicited diverse perspectives. Proponents argue that including non-Muslims in Waqf boards will enhance transparency and curb mismanagement. Conversely, critics contend that this inclusion could undermine Muslim authority over their endowments and potentially lead to government overreach. Additionally, some fear that the Bill may facilitate the confiscation of historic mosques and other properties, further marginalising the Muslim community. The INDIA bloc has also sought the support of non-aligned parties like the BJD and the YSR Congress to strengthen its stand. Such strategic outreach highlights the importance of alliances in parliamentary decision-making.
While heated debates are inevitable, as seen in the ongoing Lok Sabha discussions, they remain far superior to disruptions that leave pressing issues unaddressed. If this approach is sustained, it could herald a more mature and effective parliamentary process, where laws are debated on merit rather than reduced to political flashpoints. Democracy thrives when elected representatives engage in informed deliberation rather than staged protests. This approach should become the norm rather than the exception.
Editorials